Against Capital Punishment Essay Conclusion
Argumentative Essay on Capital Punishment
Although People think Capital punishment is against human's rights for life and it is cruel to not give the criminals another chance, I think capital punishment is still an effective way to deter violent criminals, because it can give comfort to the victims and their families, it will reduce the government's financial spending, and it is a huge warning for the criminals in order to reduce murder rate.
Capital punishment is necessary in order for justice to prevail. It is the execution of criminals for committing crimes. However, there are few controversies and opposite views. Many people think that capital punishment is against human's rights for life. It is as same as murder; the only difference is just between government killing and individual killing. The anti-capital punishment people believe that everyone might make mistakes in their lives, also everyone should have chance to correct their mistakes. It is too cruel to bereave people's chance to change. It is also too cruel to make the families of people who got capital punishment trap in sadness. If the criminals have chances to change, maybe they can become instructive for the society and make contributions for the society. It is true that capital punishment deprives criminal's lives and chances, but capital punishment does make more benefits for the social stability and social structure.
We can write a Custom Argumentative Essay for You!
First, capital punishment can give comfort to the victims and their families, and it might make the victims or the victim's families feel better knowing that the criminal will never be able to hurt anyone ever again. If the criminals didn't get capital punishment, it will upset the victim's family and cause panic to them because of the possibility of revenge. Also, the victim's family will feel unfair and unjust. They will ask why the person who destroys their family can still alive, but they have to suffering the pain. And if the victim's family feels dissatisfied with the judgment, they may think about to revenge by themselves. This will make chaos and more crimes in the society. Then, more miserable events will happen.
Second, capital punishment can reduce government's financial spending. Every year, the government should spend huge amount of money for sustain the prisoners alive in the prison. For those criminals who will stay in the prison for their whole life because of their serious crimes, the government should sustain them for the rest of their lives. The prisoners get free meals, clothes, bed, electricity, air conditioning and heating, cable and many other luxuries that make it a comfortable place to live. Many people believe that criminals live in prison are better than other peoples hard earned money. Also, there are still many innocent poor people live in poverty. Think about it, which one is worth? Should we give help to the prisoners who did serious crimes or give help to those homeless, children living in poverty and people who lose their jobs? The answer is obvious. Without spend money to maintain the prisoners who should receive capital punishment, the government can reduce their stress and use the money to create jobs, help people who live in poverty and promote the development of the country.
Third, capital punishment is a huge warning for the criminals in order to reduce murder rate. It deters murder and prevents murderers from killing again by putting the fear of death in to their minds. It also can make examples out of offenders so that the threat of death will be enough to stop them from committing such horrible crimes. People are less likely to do something if they think that harm will come to them. Therefore, the criminals should think of the consequences before they kill someone. They have the responsibility for their horrible behaviors. If they use their mind to think about this instead of just killed someone for their desire, they probably are intelligent enough to make positive impacts on the world. People might feel that sentencing them to life in prison is punishment enough.
In conclusion, Punishment by death is the ultimate punishment and one that cannot be taken back. Criminals who did serious crimes deserve to die and not stay in jail. Some people say that killing in any form is absolutely wrong. Some people agree that killing is wrong, however, if one person kills another, capital punishment is what they deserve. To give a criminal the death penalty would reassure the people close to the victim it would not happen again. Also it gives them the feeling that the death has been avenged. A family will feel less pain if the killer dies like he should. In addition, give capital punishment can save lots of money for the government to maintain the serious criminals for their whole life in prison. People can use the money to accomplish some more constructive affairs. Capital punishment also makes criminals think about whether committing a crime is really worth their lives or not. Capital punishment ensures peace of mind to the world because it ensures that murders will never kill again.
ATTENTION!!!HotEssays.blogspot.com provides free sample argumentative essays and argumentative essay examples on any topics and subjects. EssayLib.com essay writing service produces 100% custom essays, term papers & research papers, written by quality essay writers only. The prices start from $11 per page. You can get a custom argumentative essay on Capital Punishment now!
Death penalty: for and against
The death penalty prevents future murders.
Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawfulaction. Since society has the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use thestrongest punishment available to deter
murder, and that is the death penalty. Ifmurderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twicebefore killing for fear of losing their own life.
conclusion from years of deterrence studies is that the deathpenalty is, at best, no more of a deterrent than a sentence of life in prison. In fact,some criminologists maintain that the death penalty has the opposite effect: that is,society is brutalized by the use of the death penalty, and this increases the likelihoodof more murder. States in the United States that do not employ the death penaltygenerally have lower murder rates than states that do. The U.S., with the deathpenalty, has a higher murder rate than the countries of Europe or Canada, which donot use the death penalty.
A just society requires the death penalty for the taking of a life.
When someone takes a life, the balance of justice is disturbed. Unless that balance isrestored, society succumbs to a rule of violence. Only the taking of the murderer'slife restores the balance and allows society to show convincingly that murder is anintolerable crime which will be punished in kind. Retribution has its basis in religiousvalues, which have historically maintained that it is proper to take an "eye for aneye" and a life for a life. Offenders deserve the worst punishment under our systemof law, and that is the death penalty.
Retribution is another word for revenge. Although our first instinct may be to inflictimmediate pain on someone who wrongs us, the standards of a mature societydemand a more measured response. The emotional impulse for revenge is not asufficient justification for invoking a system of capital punishment. Our laws andcriminal justice system should lead us to higher principles that demonstrate acomplete respect for life, even the life of a murderer. Encouraging
our basestmotives of revenge, which ends in another killing, extends the chain of violence. Thenotion of an eye for an eye, or a life for a life, is a simplistic one which our societyhas never endorsed.
The risk of executing the innocent precludes the use of the
:r /disuadir /